Decoding TON Token Distribution: Does the TON Foundation Control 85% of the Supply?

·

Introduction

The TON Foundation's centralized control of token distribution has long been an open secret. Early miners were predominantly internal team members, with 96% of tokens mined within just 51 days between July and September 2020. Analysis suggests 85% of these tokens are under official control. This article breaks down the data behind this claim.


Key Findings

1. Token Allocation Overview

TON, initially developed by Telegram, transitioned to third-party developers due to regulatory issues. Chain data reveals highly concentrated token allocation:

1.1 Cluster 1: 22% of Supply

1.2 Cluster 2: 20% of Supply

1.3 Cluster 3: 18.8% of Supply

1.4 Cluster 4: 17.2% of Supply

👉 Explore TON's liquidity dynamics

1.5–1.7 Clusters 5–7: 7% Combined


2. Mitigation Efforts

To address centralization concerns:


Conclusion

High token concentration isn’t inherently negative (e.g., Solana’s success). However, understanding TON’s distribution is critical for investors. While Telegram’s user base bolsters TON’s potential, due diligence remains essential.


FAQ

Q: How was the 85.8% control calculated?
A: Via chain analysis of mining groups’ interconnected transactions and fund consolidation patterns.

Q: Are frozen tokens permanently locked?
A: No—they’re slated for release after 4 years of inactivity.

Q: What’s TON’s relationship with Telegram now?
A: Independent; Telegram supports integration but doesn’t control development.

👉 Learn more about TON’s ecosystem


References